![]() Back Issue Article |
April 2000 More Component Matching A few months ago I wrote a Standout Systems column titled "Component Matching." It told of my experience with Mirages MRM-1 loudspeaker, a good but tough little speaker to drive. The article described the importance of properly matching the power output of an amplifier with the power requirements of a loudspeaker for best performance. This column continues that thought and reports on some sonic mixing and matching of other components to achieve Standout System sound. The system
The name suits the speakers appearance. Its stubby and very heavy (65 pounds each), but overall, quite good-looking and well finished. The shape and look of the cabinet are similar to those of the companys other speakers, but the finish is more upscale. It uses better quality, real-wood veneers that are then finished with a high-gloss coating. The front and back panels are done in piano black. Internally, it uses much more bracing, resulting in a very solid cabinet. Its large and heavy for a stand-mounted speaker (it measures 19" tall and 16" deep!), so you need some very sturdy stands. Twenty- or 22-inch-high stands are probably ideal, but I only had 24-inchers on hand. They worked well. The Bulldog employs a unique driver configuration that includes the 6.5" bass driver used in the companys excellent W-2 subwoofer, a metal-dome, midrange driver of German descent, and a ribbon tweeter. The stubborn Bulldog has a low sensitivity (about 82.5dB) and some nasty impedance swings that make proper amplifier matching paramount. Just like the MRM-1, these are speakers not well suited for the vast majority of tube amplifiers on the planet. As for low-power, singled-ended jobs, they need not apply. Good-quality solid-state is the amplifier topology of choice. Last time I used Blue Circles BC22, this time I happened to have on hand the brand new $2775 Magnum Dynalab MD 208 receiver.
The MD 208 has more than enough power to control and push the Bulldogs to high listening levels. The combination makes for an extremely transparent and versatile system that can swing through a wide variety of music. Intimate folk, large-scale classical, and hard-driving hard rock are rendered with ease and supreme clarity. Transparency and detail are very good with highs that extend without a hint of strain and bass that lends a rock-solid foundation to any music. Just as I heard at the CES, the Bulldogs can go deeeeeep in the bass. Despite this fine sound, though, I knew a little more tweaking needed to be done to make something that was already good into something great. If there was a component to improve, at least in combination with these components, it was the digital source. It was, well, just a little too digital-sounding. Compounding this problem is the fact that the speakers and receiver let just about everything through. It all sounded good, but also a tad hard, and I felt the need to add a little warmth and bloom.
While I will try running the Capitole direct for the upcoming review, in this system, it was run into the CD input of the MD 208, where it still made splendid sound; no, scratch that -- it made gorgeous sound. Any bit of harshness that was there before vanished. What remained is beautiful, almost liquid reproduction that's among the best Ive heard from a digital source. It also brought back the perfect balance of warmth and bloom. The Capitole is smooth, seductive and sweet without being slow, sloppy and syrupy. Dare I say analoglike? So what accounts for the fine sound that this unit is capable of? Is it the tube-based output section? It could be -- it does have those qualities you sometimes associate with tubes. But, truth be told, I have no idea. What I do know is that based on the sound quality alone, this is a very good-sounding CD player that Ill be sorry to see leave. A full review is forthcoming. Finally, my inclusion of Nirvana Audio cabling throughout the system will sound, for lack of a better phrase, like a broken record. Anyone who has read my reviews or columns knows that for about the last two years these cables have shown up in every article where I discuss my equipment. These obviously arent the only cables Ive used, but they are the ones that are a mainstay in my system. Although Ive tried, and greatly liked, some other cables, Ive never stopped using the Nirvana S-L series speaker cables ($1095 for a six-foot pair terminated with spades) and S-L series interconnects ($695 for one-meter pair terminated with RCA jacks). They are, quite simply, neutral and highly revealing. They impart no sonic signature of their own. Most importantly, they have matched ideally with the many components Ive set up in my room. Sure, there are other cables that do a little better here and there, but on the whole, I find these extremely versatile cables to do the trick perfectly. Theyre certainly not cheap! However, theyve been in, and will likely stay in, my system for years.
The result So whats the moral of this story? This unlikely group of components, both in terms of technology and price, combine to form an outstanding system. It sounds startlingly good. Had these components not shown up for review simultaneously, and had I not become familiar enough with each to realize how well they could fit together, I would have likely never tried or thought to make them into a complete system. Whats more, before the MD 208 came along, I would have never suspected that a receiver-based system could sound so good. There is one more side benefit besides the great sound worth mentioning. The convenience that the all-in-one MD 208 provides (not to mention the benefits of its great tuner section) makes it an attractive centerpiece that will be a godsend to many consumers looking to cut down on all the boxes and cables in their systems. In the end, this system offers great sound through good matching. ...Doug Schneider
|
|
![]() Copyright © 2000 SoundStage! All Rights Reserved |